On Monday, December 16, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) issued an information solicitation inviting feedback on the implementation of SB 253 and SB 261. Comments are due by February 14, 2025. This information request arrives on the heels of a new CARB enforcement advisory focused on SB 253. 

SB 253, the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, requires U.S.-based entities with more than $1 billion in annual revenue doing business in California to annually report greenhouse gas emissions. SB 261, the Climate Related Financial Risk Act, requires U.S.-based entities with more than $500 million in annual revenue doing business in California to biennially report any climate-related financial risks they have identified and any measures they have adopted to reduce and adapt to those risks. For more details about these laws and their implementation timelines, please read our previous alert on 2024 amendments to the laws and our post on preparing for compliance.  We also published posts spotlighting SB 253 and SB 261 when the California legislature originally passed them.

In its solicitation, CARB posed a set of questions for stakeholders focusing on the following topics.

General Applicability, Standards, and Reporting Processes

  • How CARB should determine applicability of the laws, including how “doing business in California” should be defined and whether particular types of businesses should be covered. 
  • How CARB can best promote harmonization across jurisdictions, including how CARB can minimize duplication of efforts for entities that are required to report similar information under other programs.

SB 253

  • Whether CARB should standardize areas of GHG emissions accounting in which the GHG Protocol allows for flexibility (i.e. boundary setting, apportionment among multiple ownerships).
  • What options exist for third-party assurance for Scope 3 emissions and what standards should be used to define “limited assurance” and “reasonable level of assurance.”
  • How already-occurring voluntary emissions reporting should inform CARB’s approach to implementing SB 253.

SB 261

The full list of questions is available in the solicitation. While CARB is particularly interested in stakeholders’ responses to these questions, it welcomes additional feedback on the implementation of SB 253 and SB 261.

CARB Enforcement Advisory on GHG Emissions Reporting Law

Just prior to publishing the information request, on December 5, CARB issued an enforcement advisory stating that it plans to exercise “discretion” in enforcing SB 253 (the GHG emissions reporting requirement) during the first 2026 reporting cycle, recognizing that companies may need additional time to implement the data collection processes necessary to comply with the reporting requirements.

The advisory states that, for the first reports due in 2026, reporting entities may submit Scope 1 and 2 emissions data from the prior fiscal year that can be determined from information reporting entities “already possess” or are “already collecting” at the time the notice was issued. CARB states that it will “exercise enforcement discretion for the first report cycle, on the condition that entities demonstrate good faith efforts to comply” with the law. And for the first reporting cycle, CARB will not take enforcement action for “incomplete reporting against entities, as long as the companies make a good faith effort to retain all data relevant to emissions reporting for the entity’s prior fiscal year.” CARB notes that it plans to provide guidance for subsequent reporting cycles as part of its rulemaking process.

Together, these updates provide a clearer picture of where CARB currently stands with respect to implementation and planned enforcement of its signature climate disclosure laws. However, many implementation details remain to be settled and companies have a window to provide early feedback to the agency.   

Covington’s Carbon Management and Climate Mitigation practice has extensive experience and capabilities advising on climate mitigation strategies, regulatory frameworks, and agency engagement. Our global team is ready to assist clients as they engage with regulatory agencies and prepare to comply with climate reporting rules in California, the EU, and other jurisdictions.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Kevin Poloncarz Kevin Poloncarz

Kevin Poloncarz co-chairs the firm’s Environmental and Energy Practice Group, Energy Industry Group and ESG Practice.

Kevin is ranked by Chambers USA among the nation’s leading climate change attorneys and California’s leading environmental lawyers and by Chambers Global among the top climate change…

Kevin Poloncarz co-chairs the firm’s Environmental and Energy Practice Group, Energy Industry Group and ESG Practice.

Kevin is ranked by Chambers USA among the nation’s leading climate change attorneys and California’s leading environmental lawyers and by Chambers Global among the top climate change lawyers, with sources describing him as “exceptional,” “a superb attorney,” and “one of the most gifted advocates in this space in the country.”

He represents electric utilities, financial institutions, investors and companies in policy, litigation and transactional matters concerning power and carbon markets, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies, carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), sustainable aviation fuel, and clean hydrogen.

Kevin convenes the Energy Strategy Coalition, whose members include Austin Energy, Calpine Corporation, Constellation Energy Corporation, National Grid USA, New York Power Authority, NextEra Energy, Inc., Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District. He also leads the Clean Energy Group, whose members include Austin Energy, Calpine Corporation, Consolidated Edison, Inc., Constellation Energy Corporation, Exelon Corporation, National Grid USA, New York Power Authority, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Tenaska Energy, Inc. Both groups focus on federal environmental policy efforts affecting the power sector.

Kevin also teaches Climate Law and Policy at Stanford Law School.

Photo of Jayni Hein Jayni Hein

Jayni F. Hein co-chairs the firm’s Carbon Management and Climate Mitigation industry group.

Jayni joins the firm after serving as Senior Director for Clean Energy, Infrastructure & the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) at the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).

During…

Jayni F. Hein co-chairs the firm’s Carbon Management and Climate Mitigation industry group.

Jayni joins the firm after serving as Senior Director for Clean Energy, Infrastructure & the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) at the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).

During her tenure at CEQ, she oversaw the Biden Administration’s ambitious environmental and clean energy agenda, leading work on low carbon projects and climate disclosure, and advancing the successful implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021) and Inflation Reduction Act (2022).

Jayni has extensive experience advising clients on climate and environmental laws and regulations, including the Clean Air Act, NEPA, and Endangered Species Act, as well as corporate decarbonization goals and reporting. Leveraging her senior government experience, Jayni advises companies and investors on compliance and strategy in light of increased scrutiny of corporate climate and net-zero commitments. She advises clients on the legal and policy issues relating to ESG and climate-related regulatory requirements, investor demands, global reporting frameworks, and strategic business opportunities.

In addition, as the former senior political appointee spearheading work to revise permitting regulations and issue guidance on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, Jayni offers clients first-hand experience with infrastructure projects that require federal and state permits and authorization. She helps clients identify new funding opportunities and successfully advance clean energy and other infrastructure projects, including onshore and offshore wind, solar, hydrogen, transmission, semiconductor, and carbon, capture, and sequestration (CCS) projects.

Clients benefit from her ability to creatively troubleshoot issues, establish relationships across government, and engage policymakers, industry, non-profit organizations, and other key stakeholders in constructive conversations around climate change, environmental justice, and corporate decarbonization goals.

Eva Dorrough

Eva Dorrough is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office. She is a member of the Environmental and Energy Practice Group, advising clients on state and federal environmental regulations, enforcement actions, and climate disclosure laws. She also works on complex litigation matters…

Eva Dorrough is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office. She is a member of the Environmental and Energy Practice Group, advising clients on state and federal environmental regulations, enforcement actions, and climate disclosure laws. She also works on complex litigation matters in the Commercial Litigation Practice Group and maintains an active pro bono practice.