The European Union (“EU”) has passed the world’s most far-reaching mandatory environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) reporting regime.

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”) will apply to an initial group of large EU companies from 2024 and gradually extend its reach to smaller companies over the course of the following four years. It is ultimately expected to apply to more than 50,000 companies incorporated, listed, or doing business in the EU. Notably, from 2028 the CSRD will apply to non-EU parent companies that generate more than EUR 150M of net turnover in the EU and have at least one EU subsidiary subject to the CSRD (or a local branch of a certain size). (See Appendix for a table with detailed information on the CSRD’s application thresholds and dates.)

The purpose of the CSRD is to create detailed, audited, public, and comparable ESG reporting across a wide range of public and non-public companies. To this end, the European Commission (“Commission”) is expected to adopt detailed mandatory ESG disclosure requirements as the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (“ESRS”). Further, CSRD reporting will be subject to limited assurance by accredited auditors and is expected to ultimately be subject to more rigorous assurance standards (i.e., “reasonable” assurance). The intention is to both provide investors with the information they need to make investment decisions that consider sustainability factors, and more generally to increase transparency concerning companies’ ESG impacts for other stakeholders (e.g., regulators, consumers, civil society, and NGOs).

Status and Implementation Timeline

By mid-2024 Member States will be required to adopt national laws implementing the CSRD. As noted above, the application of those laws will then be phased in for different groups of companies, beginning in 2024 with the first reports due in 2025. (See Appendix for details.)

EFRAG and the ESRS

The CSRD will be operationalized through the ESRS, which the Commission must adopt as delegated acts by June 2023. A proposed draft set of ESRS has been developed over the course of the past year by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (“EFRAG”) and was submitted to the Commission for consideration last week.

The proposed draft ESRS include two general standards and ten subject matter-specific standards across the “E”, “S”, and “G” pillars. As currently proposed, the ESRS would cover 84 discrete disclosure requirements and 1,144 quantitative and qualitative data points.

The general standards address key foundational concepts as well as reporting processes and format of CSRD-compliant sustainability reporting. ESRS 1, for example, defines the concept of “double materiality,” which is one of the key tenets of CSRD reporting. The double materiality standard means that, unlike some other ESG reporting regimes, companies must report not only on the potential financial impact to their businesses of ESG issues but also on the material impacts that their businesses have on people and the planet. In other words, companies will be required to report on issues that are not material from a financial perspective. ESRS 1 also clarifies that some disclosures—for example on greenhouse gas emissions—are always material.

The ten subject matter-specific ESRS cover all three ESG pillars as follows (see here for all draft ESRS).

Sector-Specific ESRS

The general ESRS outlined above will be complemented with sector-specific standards applicable to companies in a broad range of sectors including information technology, financial services, oil and gas, energy production and utilities, motor vehicles, agriculture, food and beverage, and biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.

EFRAG will develop the sector-specific standards over the course of 2023. EFRAG is currently conducting workshops and public sessions to solicit input from stakeholders on the sector specific draft ESRS. The CSRD requires the Commission to adopt sector-specific standards by June 2024 taking into consideration draft standards developed by EFRAG.

Commission Adoption of ESRS

The Commission will now start the regulatory process to adopt the first set of cross-sectoral ESRS proposed by EFRAG as Commission delegated acts, which will require consultation with Member States’ expert groups. At this stage, there is still scope for stakeholders to be heard. The Commission must take into consideration EFRAG’s technical advice but it is not bound by it and must carefully review it and take full responsibility for the ESRS that it adopts as delegated acts.

The CSRD also establishes a triennial review of the ESRS to take into account developments related to ESG reporting, including with regard to international standards (e.g., those developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board (“ISSB”)). The CSRD requires the Commission to take account of the work of global standard-setting initiatives for sustainability reporting to “the greatest extent possible.” During the development of the ESRS, global regulatory alignment and inter-operability have been a key concern of the business community.

Steps Companies Can Take Now to Prepare

Although the CSRD will not apply to companies until 2024 (at the earliest), many companies are already undertaking steps to prepare for compliance.

Specific issues we see companies considering:

  • Mapping application thresholds to corporate structure.
  • Considering group vs. individual entity-level ESG reporting.
  • Restructuring internal ESG governance processes.
  • Assessing existing ESG reporting efforts and conducting gap analyses against the requirements of the CSRD.
  • Evaluating ESG data availability and quality, including for assurance readiness purposes.
  • Assessing the interplay between the CSRD and existing legal regimes—such as, for example, the EU Taxonomy Regulation’s technical screening criteria and the environment-focused disclosures pursuant to the CSRD.
  • Assessing potential legal risks that may arise in relation to CSRD reporting, including litigation and enforcement risk.

Appendix: CSRD Application Thresholds and Dates

Type of CompanyDefinitionApplication Date* / First Sustainability Report DueApplicable Reporting Standard
Large EU Public Interest Entities (“PIEs”)Large Company (as defined below) that has more than 500 employees (annual average) and that has either (i) transferable securities listed on a regulated market in the EU, (ii) is a credit institution or insurance undertaking as defined by EU law, or (iii) is designated by a EU Member State as a PIE.   (Note: These companies are already subject to the EU’s Non-Financial Reporting Directive (“NFRD”), the precursor to the CSRD.)FY 2024 / 2025ESRS
Large Company / Large GroupLarge Company: Meets at least 2 of the following 3 conditions: (i) more than 250 employees (annual average), (ii) more than EUR 40M in net turnover, and/or (iii) more than EUR 20M in total assets.   Large Group: Consisting of an EU parent company and its subsidiary companies (whether in the EU or ex-EU) that on a consolidated basis meet the definition of a “large company.”FY 2025 / 2026ESRS
Listed Small- and Medium Enterprise (“SME”)Is not a Large Company but has transferable securities listed on a regulated market” in the EU and meets at least 2 of the following 3 conditions: (i) more than 10 employees (annual average), (ii) EUR 700k in net turnover, and (iii) EUR 350k in total assets.FY 2026
(can opt to delay until FY 2028) / 2027 (2029 if delay)
ESRS
Non-EU Parent Company With Significant Business in the EUCompany that is not established under the laws of a EU Member State (e.g., the US) and that has generated more than EUR 150M of net turnover in the EU for each of the last two consecutive financial years and has at least: (i) one subsidiary that meets any of the definitions above (e.g., Large Company), or (ii) a branch (generally an unincorporated physical presence) that generated net turnover greater than EUR 40M in the preceding year.FY 2028 / 2029Choice of:
(i) ESRS; (ii) specific sustainability reporting standards the EU will develop for non-EU parent companies; or (iii) sustainability reporting standards of home jurisdiction that EU considers equivalent.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Paul Mertenskötter Paul Mertenskötter

Paul Mertenskötter is an associate in the firm’s Brussels office and a member of the Public Policy and International Trade practice groups. He advises multinational companies, governments, and other clients on a range of matters related to public policy, international trade, and new…

Paul Mertenskötter is an associate in the firm’s Brussels office and a member of the Public Policy and International Trade practice groups. He advises multinational companies, governments, and other clients on a range of matters related to public policy, international trade, and new technologies. Mr. Mertenskötter’s practice encompasses advising clients on the European Commission’s Digital Single Market strategy, including on the Payment Services Directive (PSD 2).

Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Mertenskötter clerked at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, and was a Fellow at the Institute for International Law and Justice at NYU Law School. His work has been published with Oxford University Press and the Cornell Law Review.

Photo of Sarah Bishop Sarah Bishop

Sarah Bishop advises companies on compliance best practices and enforcement risks arising under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, U.S. and UK anti-money laundering laws, and other financial crime laws. Qualified in the United States and as a Solicitor…

Sarah Bishop advises companies on compliance best practices and enforcement risks arising under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, U.S. and UK anti-money laundering laws, and other financial crime laws. Qualified in the United States and as a Solicitor of England & Wales, she is able to help companies navigate risks arising in both jurisdictions. She also has experience of other anti-corruption laws (e.g., France’s Loi Sapin II) and works with trusted local partners to deliver coordinated advice that takes into account the requirements of multiple legal regimes. Sarah’s compliance advisory practice includes helping multinational corporations develop and test the robustness of compliance programs, conduct risk assessments, conduct transactional and third party due diligence, navigate post-acquisition compliance integration projects, and deliver compliance training.

As a member of Covington’s Business and Human Rights practice group, Sarah advises companies on evolving developments and best practices related to the corporate responsibility to respect human rights, including in relation to supply chain due diligence and responsible sourcing, reporting and transparency obligations, and strategies for integrating human rights elements into existing compliance programs.

Sarah also helps clients navigate internal and government-facing investigations involving allegations of bribery and corruption, money laundering, export control and sanctions violations, fraud, and other forms of misconduct. She has handled matters before major international enforcement authorities, and she has been recognized by the Global Investigations Review as being among the leading women investigations practitioners worldwide. In addition to government enforcement matters, Sarah assists clients in suspension and debarment matters before the World Bank and other international financial institutions.

Photo of Cándido García Molyneux Cándido García Molyneux

Cándido García Molyneux provides clients with regulatory, policy and strategic advice on EU environmental and product safety legislation. He helps clients influence EU legislation and guidance and comply with requirements in an efficient manner, representing them before the EU Courts and institutions.

Cándido…

Cándido García Molyneux provides clients with regulatory, policy and strategic advice on EU environmental and product safety legislation. He helps clients influence EU legislation and guidance and comply with requirements in an efficient manner, representing them before the EU Courts and institutions.

Cándido co-chairs the firm’s Environmental Practice Group.

Cándido has a deep knowledge of EU requirements on chemicals, circular economy and waste management, climate change, energy efficiency, renewable energies as well as their interrelationship with specific product categories and industries, such as electronics, cosmetics, healthcare products, and more general consumer products.

In addition, Cándido has particular expertise on EU institutional and trade law, and the import of food products into the EU. Cándido also regularly advises clients on Spanish food and drug law.

Cándido is described by Chambers Europe as being “creative and frighteningly smart.” His clients note that “he has a very measured, considered, deliberative manner,” and that “he has superb analytical and writing skills.”

Photo of Bart Van Vooren Bart Van Vooren

Bart Van Vooren has a broad life sciences practice supporting innovative pharmaceutical, food, medtech and biotech companies on EU regulatory, commercial and strategic policy assignments. He is widely recognized for his expertise on general EU law and procedure, as well as his extensive…

Bart Van Vooren has a broad life sciences practice supporting innovative pharmaceutical, food, medtech and biotech companies on EU regulatory, commercial and strategic policy assignments. He is widely recognized for his expertise on general EU law and procedure, as well as his extensive litigation experience before the EU Court of Justice in dozens of cases.

Over the past seven years, Mr. Van Vooren has developed a niche practice on compliance with the Biodiversity Convention and the Nagoya Protocol, a set of rules to combat bio-piracy worldwide. He has accumulated unique, practical experience in dozens of jurisdictions around the world, and has handled everything from benefit-sharing negotiations, over compliance programs, to inspections by authorities.

Finally, Mr. Van Vooren has an active pro bono practice assisting NGOs defending the human rights of persons with a disability through strategic litigation.