The European Union (“EU”) has passed the world’s most far-reaching mandatory environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) reporting regime.

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”) will apply to an initial group of large EU companies from 2024 and gradually extend its reach to smaller companies over the course of the following four years. It is ultimately expected to apply to more than 50,000 companies incorporated, listed, or doing business in the EU. Notably, from 2028 the CSRD will apply to non-EU parent companies that generate more than EUR 150M of net turnover in the EU and have at least one EU subsidiary subject to the CSRD (or a local branch of a certain size). (See Appendix for a table with detailed information on the CSRD’s application thresholds and dates.)

The purpose of the CSRD is to create detailed, audited, public, and comparable ESG reporting across a wide range of public and non-public companies. To this end, the European Commission (“Commission”) is expected to adopt detailed mandatory ESG disclosure requirements as the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (“ESRS”). Further, CSRD reporting will be subject to limited assurance by accredited auditors and is expected to ultimately be subject to more rigorous assurance standards (i.e., “reasonable” assurance). The intention is to both provide investors with the information they need to make investment decisions that consider sustainability factors, and more generally to increase transparency concerning companies’ ESG impacts for other stakeholders (e.g., regulators, consumers, civil society, and NGOs).

Status and Implementation Timeline

By mid-2024 Member States will be required to adopt national laws implementing the CSRD. As noted above, the application of those laws will then be phased in for different groups of companies, beginning in 2024 with the first reports due in 2025. (See Appendix for details.)

EFRAG and the ESRS

The CSRD will be operationalized through the ESRS, which the Commission must adopt as delegated acts by June 2023. A proposed draft set of ESRS has been developed over the course of the past year by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (“EFRAG”) and was submitted to the Commission for consideration last week.

The proposed draft ESRS include two general standards and ten subject matter-specific standards across the “E”, “S”, and “G” pillars. As currently proposed, the ESRS would cover 84 discrete disclosure requirements and 1,144 quantitative and qualitative data points.

The general standards address key foundational concepts as well as reporting processes and format of CSRD-compliant sustainability reporting. ESRS 1, for example, defines the concept of “double materiality,” which is one of the key tenets of CSRD reporting. The double materiality standard means that, unlike some other ESG reporting regimes, companies must report not only on the potential financial impact to their businesses of ESG issues but also on the material impacts that their businesses have on people and the planet. In other words, companies will be required to report on issues that are not material from a financial perspective. ESRS 1 also clarifies that some disclosures—for example on greenhouse gas emissions—are always material.

The ten subject matter-specific ESRS cover all three ESG pillars as follows (see here for all draft ESRS).

Sector-Specific ESRS

The general ESRS outlined above will be complemented with sector-specific standards applicable to companies in a broad range of sectors including information technology, financial services, oil and gas, energy production and utilities, motor vehicles, agriculture, food and beverage, and biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.

EFRAG will develop the sector-specific standards over the course of 2023. EFRAG is currently conducting workshops and public sessions to solicit input from stakeholders on the sector specific draft ESRS. The CSRD requires the Commission to adopt sector-specific standards by June 2024 taking into consideration draft standards developed by EFRAG.

Commission Adoption of ESRS

The Commission will now start the regulatory process to adopt the first set of cross-sectoral ESRS proposed by EFRAG as Commission delegated acts, which will require consultation with Member States’ expert groups. At this stage, there is still scope for stakeholders to be heard. The Commission must take into consideration EFRAG’s technical advice but it is not bound by it and must carefully review it and take full responsibility for the ESRS that it adopts as delegated acts.

The CSRD also establishes a triennial review of the ESRS to take into account developments related to ESG reporting, including with regard to international standards (e.g., those developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board (“ISSB”)). The CSRD requires the Commission to take account of the work of global standard-setting initiatives for sustainability reporting to “the greatest extent possible.” During the development of the ESRS, global regulatory alignment and inter-operability have been a key concern of the business community.

Steps Companies Can Take Now to Prepare

Although the CSRD will not apply to companies until 2024 (at the earliest), many companies are already undertaking steps to prepare for compliance.

Specific issues we see companies considering:

  • Mapping application thresholds to corporate structure.
  • Considering group vs. individual entity-level ESG reporting.
  • Restructuring internal ESG governance processes.
  • Assessing existing ESG reporting efforts and conducting gap analyses against the requirements of the CSRD.
  • Evaluating ESG data availability and quality, including for assurance readiness purposes.
  • Assessing the interplay between the CSRD and existing legal regimes—such as, for example, the EU Taxonomy Regulation’s technical screening criteria and the environment-focused disclosures pursuant to the CSRD.
  • Assessing potential legal risks that may arise in relation to CSRD reporting, including litigation and enforcement risk.

Appendix: CSRD Application Thresholds and Dates

Type of CompanyDefinitionApplication Date* / First Sustainability Report DueApplicable Reporting Standard
Large EU Public Interest Entities (“PIEs”)Large Company (as defined below) that has more than 500 employees (annual average) and that has either (i) transferable securities listed on a regulated market in the EU, (ii) is a credit institution or insurance undertaking as defined by EU law, or (iii) is designated by a EU Member State as a PIE.   (Note: These companies are already subject to the EU’s Non-Financial Reporting Directive (“NFRD”), the precursor to the CSRD.)FY 2024 / 2025ESRS
Large Company / Large GroupLarge Company: Meets at least 2 of the following 3 conditions: (i) more than 250 employees (annual average), (ii) more than EUR 40M in net turnover, and/or (iii) more than EUR 20M in total assets.   Large Group: Consisting of an EU parent company and its subsidiary companies (whether in the EU or ex-EU) that on a consolidated basis meet the definition of a “large company.”FY 2025 / 2026ESRS
Listed Small- and Medium Enterprise (“SME”)Is not a Large Company but has transferable securities listed on a regulated market” in the EU and meets at least 2 of the following 3 conditions: (i) more than 10 employees (annual average), (ii) EUR 700k in net turnover, and (iii) EUR 350k in total assets.FY 2026
(can opt to delay until FY 2028) / 2027 (2029 if delay)
ESRS
Non-EU Parent Company With Significant Business in the EUCompany that is not established under the laws of a EU Member State (e.g., the US) and that has generated more than EUR 150M of net turnover in the EU for each of the last two consecutive financial years and has at least: (i) one subsidiary that meets any of the definitions above (e.g., Large Company), or (ii) a branch (generally an unincorporated physical presence) that generated net turnover greater than EUR 40M in the preceding year.FY 2028 / 2029Choice of:
(i) ESRS; (ii) specific sustainability reporting standards the EU will develop for non-EU parent companies; or (iii) sustainability reporting standards of home jurisdiction that EU considers equivalent.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Paul Mertenskötter Paul Mertenskötter

Paul Mertenskötter advises companies, investors, and governments on regulatory environmental, social, and governance (ESG), international trade, and public policy matters.

Paul has particular experience advising multinational companies on EU sustainability laws, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence…

Paul Mertenskötter advises companies, investors, and governments on regulatory environmental, social, and governance (ESG), international trade, and public policy matters.

Paul has particular experience advising multinational companies on EU sustainability laws, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), the Taxonomy Regulation, the Forced Labor Regulation, and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). His practice also spans a wide range of climate change issues, including carbon offsets, accounting rules, and related international sustainability reporting frameworks such as the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). Paul further advises clients on their strategic engagement with the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO), free trade agreements, the Paris Agreement, and general public international law.

Prior to joining the firm, Paul was a Visiting Scholar at the WTO in Geneva, clerked at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, and was a Fellow at the Institute for International Law and Justice at NYU Law School.

Photo of Sarah Bishop Sarah Bishop

Sarah Bishop is a U.S. and UK-qualified lawyer who advises companies on ethics and compliance programs, compliance with anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws, business and human rights (BHR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters, white collar investigations, and suspension and debarment.

Sarah’s…

Sarah Bishop is a U.S. and UK-qualified lawyer who advises companies on ethics and compliance programs, compliance with anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws, business and human rights (BHR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters, white collar investigations, and suspension and debarment.

Sarah’s compliance advisory practice includes helping multinational corporations develop and test the robustness of ethics and compliance programs, conducting risk assessments, conducting transactional and third party due diligence, supporting post-acquisition compliance integration projects, and delivering compliance training. She has particular expertise advising on the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and UK Bribery Act and has advised companies in the energy, mining, pharmaceutical, healthcare, technology, and consumer goods sectors, among others, on anti-corruption compliance risks and program development.

As a member of Covington’s Business and Human Rights practice group, Sarah advises companies on the developing legal and enforcement landscape related to the corporate responsibility to respect human rights. She advises on enforcement risks under Withhold Release Orders (WROs), the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) in the United States, as well as developing ESG due diligence and reporting requirements in Europe. Sarah has helped multinational corporations in the healthcare, technology, automotive, energy, mining, and consumer goods sectors develop human rights due diligence programs, navigate human rights-related enforcement matters, and report on human rights due diligence efforts.

Sarah has extensive experience conducting internal and government-facing white collar investigations. Sarah has conducted investigations involving allegations of bribery, money laundering, export control and sanctions violations, fraud, human rights violations, and other forms of misconduct. She has handled matters before major international enforcement authorities and has been recognized in the Global Investigations Review Women in Investigations survey.

Sarah also assists clients in suspension and debarment matters before the World Bank and other international financial institutions.

Photo of Cándido García Molyneux Cándido García Molyneux

Cándido García Molyneux provides clients with regulatory, policy and strategic advice on EU environmental and product safety legislation. He helps clients influence EU legislation and guidance and comply with requirements in an efficient manner, representing them before the EU Courts and institutions.

Cándido…

Cándido García Molyneux provides clients with regulatory, policy and strategic advice on EU environmental and product safety legislation. He helps clients influence EU legislation and guidance and comply with requirements in an efficient manner, representing them before the EU Courts and institutions.

Cándido co-chairs the firm’s Environmental Practice Group.

Cándido has a deep knowledge of EU requirements on chemicals, circular economy and waste management, climate change, energy efficiency, renewable energies as well as their interrelationship with specific product categories and industries, such as electronics, cosmetics, healthcare products, and more general consumer products. He has worked on energy consumption and energy efficiency requirements of AI models under the EU AI Act.

In addition, Cándido has particular expertise on EU institutional and trade law, and the import of food products into the EU. Cándido also regularly advises clients on Spanish food and drug law.

Cándido is described by Chambers Europe as being “creative and frighteningly smart.” His clients note that “he has a very measured, considered, deliberative manner,” and that “he has superb analytical and writing skills.”

Photo of Bart Van Vooren Bart Van Vooren

Bart Van Vooren, partner leads a dynamic practice at the intersection of EU regulatory law, global health, and biodiversity law. In these fields, he advises innovative pharmaceutical, food, cosmetic and technology companies on complex EU and global regulatory, compliance and policy assignments.

Bart…

Bart Van Vooren, partner leads a dynamic practice at the intersection of EU regulatory law, global health, and biodiversity law. In these fields, he advises innovative pharmaceutical, food, cosmetic and technology companies on complex EU and global regulatory, compliance and policy assignments.

Bart holds a Ph.D. in EU and International Law and was a professor of EU law until 2013. During that time, he wrote the first-ever handbook with Cambridge University Press on “EU External Relations Law” (2014). He then transitioned to private practice, and frequently acted for the Belgian government before the EU Court of Justice (e.g. C-16/16P Belgium vs Commission). Bart joined Covington in 2016, leading some of our most consequential EU litigation proceedings (e.g. C-311/18 “Schrems II”) over the years.  Having handled nearly 50 cases before the EU Court, he’s uniquely qualified to support our corporate clients in our most high-stakes disputes. Recent examples include T-189/21 Aloe Vera of Europe v Commission (which we won, so the Commission decided to appeal); as well as T-201/21 Covington & Burling and Van Vooren v Commission (which we also won, and hence is also on appeal).

As a pioneer in biodiversity law, over the past 15 years Bart has built a unique, global practice on Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) laws under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Nagoya Protocol, the Plant Treaty, the High Seas Treaty and the WHO Pandemic Agreement. ABS compliance is critical when sourcing biological materials for life sciences R&D and I work with many of the world’s innovative life sciences companies on the whole range of e.g. transactional, contractual, compliance, IP, (EU) regulatory and litigation work relating to ABS. As biodiversity has increasingly become identified as a major commercial and financial risk to companies, so has the practice expanded to e.g. biodiversity credit markets, biodiversity insurance, biodiversity claims and advertising, and so on. Since April 2025, Bart has been appointed as the industry representative to the Steering Committee of the UN Biodiversity Fund that seeks funding from the private sector for biodiversity conservation and restoration.

Bart also pioneered our global health practice. He has advised pharmaceutical clients on seasonal and pandemic influenza since 2016. Since then, this practice area expanded to cover all matters relating to infectious diseases, and as of 2020, emergency preparedness and response (eg. WHO prequalification, International Coordination Group negotiations, Emergency Use Listing, International Health Regulations Rev 2024). He has been the pharmaceutical industry’s lead lawyer advising on the WHO Pandemic Treaty negotiations, adopted on 14 May 2025. Currently, he continues to advise on the work of the Intergovernmental Working Group (“IGWG”) teasing out the technical details of the “Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System” intended to create legally binding obligations on companies to commit vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics in case of a new global health emergency.

In Chambers rankings, clients have kindly described Bart as “very knowledgeable, action-focused and service-focused lawyer”, adding that he “really tries to find a way of working through challenges”, am “customer-oriented” and provide “sound advice and reasonable options for our business with pros and cons.”

Finally, Bart has an active pro bono practice assisting NGOs defending the human rights of persons with a disability through strategic litigation before the EU Court.